http://www.markpneyer.com/wp/2007/05/26/i-am-not-dead/ Finding Interesting, Useful, and Beautiful Mathematical Patterns in the Universe Thu, 26 Jan 2012 02:40:30 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.markpneyer.com/wp/2007/05/26/i-am-not-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-249 markpneyer Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:10:03 +0000 http://markpneyer.com/wp/2007/05/26/i-am-not-dead/#comment-249 A lot of creationist arguments are nonsensical, but science can never 'win' the debate it's trying to win, because science can make no claims about the real world with any certainty. That's what I'm arguing (and hopefully making quite clear) in my theory of knowledge. A lot of creationist arguments are nonsensical, but science can never ‘win’ the debate it’s trying to win, because science can make no claims about the real world with any certainty. That’s what I’m arguing (and hopefully making quite clear) in my theory of knowledge.

]]> http://www.markpneyer.com/wp/2007/05/26/i-am-not-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-248 Anonymous Thu, 31 May 2007 23:20:29 +0000 http://markpneyer.com/wp/2007/05/26/i-am-not-dead/#comment-248 You should read "Language of God" to understand the debate better. Its written by a christian scientist who helped decode the human genome. While he's a little gung-ho sometimes, the arguments he puts forth are actually decent, and he really destroys a lot of the Creationist arguments. You should read “Language of God” to understand the debate better. Its written by a christian scientist who helped decode the human genome. While he’s a little gung-ho sometimes, the arguments he puts forth are actually decent, and he really destroys a lot of the Creationist arguments.

]]>